Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations

A good bioindicator of soil health is one that perceives minor changes due to changes in soil management and leads to changes in the processes of the soil ecosystem. The aim was to evaluate the use of soil bioindicators in the determination of the utility of two different Cedrela odorata forestry ma...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Alarcón Gutiérrez, Enrique, Hernández, Christian, Gardner, Terrence, García Pérez, José Antonio, Caballero, Mayra, Perroni, Yareni, Farnet da Silva, Anne Marie a, Gaime Perraud, Isabelle, Barois, Isabelle
Format: Online
Langue:eng
spa
Publié: Instituto de Ecología, A.C. 2021
Accès en ligne:https://myb.ojs.inecol.mx/index.php/myb/article/view/e2711912
_version_ 1799769380663328768
author Alarcón Gutiérrez, Enrique
Hernández, Christian
Gardner, Terrence
García Pérez, José Antonio
Caballero, Mayra
Perroni, Yareni
Farnet da Silva, Anne Marie a
Gaime Perraud, Isabelle
Barois, Isabelle
author_facet Alarcón Gutiérrez, Enrique
Hernández, Christian
Gardner, Terrence
García Pérez, José Antonio
Caballero, Mayra
Perroni, Yareni
Farnet da Silva, Anne Marie a
Gaime Perraud, Isabelle
Barois, Isabelle
author_sort Alarcón Gutiérrez, Enrique
collection MYB
description A good bioindicator of soil health is one that perceives minor changes due to changes in soil management and leads to changes in the processes of the soil ecosystem. The aim was to evaluate the use of soil bioindicators in the determination of the utility of two different Cedrela odorata forestry management systems. The litter and soil samples were collected from the rhizosphere of a monoculture (with no fertilization nor irrigation), and a co-culture (with fertilization and irrigation) stand with Citrus latifolia. The soil and litter bioindicators measured were the activity of acetylesterase (FDA), acid phosphatase (AcPh), alkaline phosphatase (AlkPh), laccase, and the estimation of the potential net rate of carbon mineralization (PNRCM). The results indicated that soil enzyme activities (FDA and phosphatases) in the litter were sensitive to the different management system treatments. Enzymatic activity, per unit dry weight, was higher in litter of co-culture (FDA = 1.05 nkat g-1 AcPh = 1.33 nkat g-1; AlkPh = 03.0 nkat g-1) than in litter of monoculture (FDA = 0.617nkat g-1; AcPh = 0.40 nkat g-1; AlkPh = 0. 983 nkat g-1). Differences in soil total nitrogen content, organic matter (OM) content, and micronutrients were found. In general, the co-culture stand (with fertilization and irrigation) with C. latifolia showed the best results.
format Online
id oai:oai.myb.ojs.inecol.mx:article-1912
institution Madera y Bosques
language eng
spa
publishDate 2021
publisher Instituto de Ecología, A.C.
record_format ojs
spelling oai:oai.myb.ojs.inecol.mx:article-19122022-11-29T22:29:14Z Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations Bioindicadores de suelo asociados a diferentes regímenes de gestión de plantaciones de Cedrela odorata Alarcón Gutiérrez, Enrique Hernández, Christian Gardner, Terrence García Pérez, José Antonio Caballero, Mayra Perroni, Yareni Farnet da Silva, Anne Marie a Gaime Perraud, Isabelle Barois, Isabelle acetylesterase cedar forest Persian lime phosphatase soil metabolism acetilesterasa cedro bosque limón persa fosfatasa metabolismo del suelo A good bioindicator of soil health is one that perceives minor changes due to changes in soil management and leads to changes in the processes of the soil ecosystem. The aim was to evaluate the use of soil bioindicators in the determination of the utility of two different Cedrela odorata forestry management systems. The litter and soil samples were collected from the rhizosphere of a monoculture (with no fertilization nor irrigation), and a co-culture (with fertilization and irrigation) stand with Citrus latifolia. The soil and litter bioindicators measured were the activity of acetylesterase (FDA), acid phosphatase (AcPh), alkaline phosphatase (AlkPh), laccase, and the estimation of the potential net rate of carbon mineralization (PNRCM). The results indicated that soil enzyme activities (FDA and phosphatases) in the litter were sensitive to the different management system treatments. Enzymatic activity, per unit dry weight, was higher in litter of co-culture (FDA = 1.05 nkat g-1 AcPh = 1.33 nkat g-1; AlkPh = 03.0 nkat g-1) than in litter of monoculture (FDA = 0.617nkat g-1; AcPh = 0.40 nkat g-1; AlkPh = 0. 983 nkat g-1). Differences in soil total nitrogen content, organic matter (OM) content, and micronutrients were found. In general, the co-culture stand (with fertilization and irrigation) with C. latifolia showed the best results. Un buen bioindicador de la salud del suelo es aquel que percibe cambios menores, debidos a modificaciones en el manejo del suelo, y conduce a cambios en los procesos del ecosistema suelo. El objetivo fue evaluar el uso de bioindicadores de suelo en la determinación de la utilidad de dos sistemas diferentes de manejo forestal de Cedrela odorata. El mantillo y el suelo se recolectaron de la rizosfera de un monocultivo (sin fertilización ni irrigación) y un cocultivo (con fertilización e irrigación) con Citrus latifolia. Los bioindicadores de suelo y mantillo medidos fueron: las actividades acetilesterasa (FDA), fosfatasa ácida (AcPh), fosfatasa alcalina (AlkPh) y lacasa. También se estimó la tasa neta potencial de mineralización de carbono (PNRCM). Los resultados indican que las actividades enzimáticas del suelo (FDA y fosfatasas) en el mantillo fueron sensibles a los diferentes sistemas de manejo. La actividad enzimática, por unidad de peso seco, fue mayor en los cocultivos (FDA = 1.05 nkat g-1; AcPh = 1.33 nkat g-1; AlkPh = 3 nkat g-1) que en los monocultivos (FDA = 0.617 nkat g-1; AcPh = 0.40 nkat g-1; AlkPh = 0. 983 nkat g-1). Se encontraron diferencias en la cantidad de nitrógeno total, el contenido de materia orgánica (MO) y los micronutrientes. En general, los cultivos (con fertilización e irrigación) con C. latifolia mostraron los mejores resultados. Instituto de Ecología, A.C. 2021-08-10 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares application/pdf text/xml https://myb.ojs.inecol.mx/index.php/myb/article/view/e2711912 10.21829/myb.2021.2711912 Madera y Bosques; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2021): Spring 2021 Madera y Bosques; Vol. 27 Núm. 1 (2021): Primavera 2021 2448-7597 1405-0471 eng spa https://myb.ojs.inecol.mx/index.php/myb/article/view/e2711912/2245 https://myb.ojs.inecol.mx/index.php/myb/article/view/e2711912/2251 10.21829/myb.2019.251365 10.21829/myb.2020.261383 Derechos de autor 2021 Madera y Bosques http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
spellingShingle Alarcón Gutiérrez, Enrique
Hernández, Christian
Gardner, Terrence
García Pérez, José Antonio
Caballero, Mayra
Perroni, Yareni
Farnet da Silva, Anne Marie a
Gaime Perraud, Isabelle
Barois, Isabelle
Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations
title Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations
title_full Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations
title_fullStr Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations
title_full_unstemmed Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations
title_short Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations
title_sort soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of cedrela odorata plantations
url https://myb.ojs.inecol.mx/index.php/myb/article/view/e2711912
work_keys_str_mv AT alarcongutierrezenrique soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations
AT hernandezchristian soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations
AT gardnerterrence soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations
AT garciaperezjoseantonio soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations
AT caballeromayra soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations
AT perroniyareni soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations
AT farnetdasilvaannemariea soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations
AT gaimeperraudisabelle soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations
AT baroisisabelle soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations
AT alarcongutierrezenrique bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata
AT hernandezchristian bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata
AT gardnerterrence bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata
AT garciaperezjoseantonio bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata
AT caballeromayra bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata
AT perroniyareni bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata
AT farnetdasilvaannemariea bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata
AT gaimeperraudisabelle bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata
AT baroisisabelle bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata