Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations
A good bioindicator of soil health is one that perceives minor changes due to changes in soil management and leads to changes in the processes of the soil ecosystem. The aim was to evaluate the use of soil bioindicators in the determination of the utility of two different Cedrela odorata forestry ma...
Auteurs principaux: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Langue: | eng spa |
Publié: |
Instituto de Ecología, A.C.
2021
|
Accès en ligne: | https://myb.ojs.inecol.mx/index.php/myb/article/view/e2711912 |
_version_ | 1799769380663328768 |
---|---|
author | Alarcón Gutiérrez, Enrique Hernández, Christian Gardner, Terrence García Pérez, José Antonio Caballero, Mayra Perroni, Yareni Farnet da Silva, Anne Marie a Gaime Perraud, Isabelle Barois, Isabelle |
author_facet | Alarcón Gutiérrez, Enrique Hernández, Christian Gardner, Terrence García Pérez, José Antonio Caballero, Mayra Perroni, Yareni Farnet da Silva, Anne Marie a Gaime Perraud, Isabelle Barois, Isabelle |
author_sort | Alarcón Gutiérrez, Enrique |
collection | MYB |
description | A good bioindicator of soil health is one that perceives minor changes due to changes in soil management and leads to changes in the processes of the soil ecosystem. The aim was to evaluate the use of soil bioindicators in the determination of the utility of two different Cedrela odorata forestry management systems. The litter and soil samples were collected from the rhizosphere of a monoculture (with no fertilization nor irrigation), and a co-culture (with fertilization and irrigation) stand with Citrus latifolia. The soil and litter bioindicators measured were the activity of acetylesterase (FDA), acid phosphatase (AcPh), alkaline phosphatase (AlkPh), laccase, and the estimation of the potential net rate of carbon mineralization (PNRCM). The results indicated that soil enzyme activities (FDA and phosphatases) in the litter were sensitive to the different management system treatments. Enzymatic activity, per unit dry weight, was higher in litter of co-culture (FDA = 1.05 nkat g-1 AcPh = 1.33 nkat g-1; AlkPh = 03.0 nkat g-1) than in litter of monoculture (FDA = 0.617nkat g-1; AcPh = 0.40 nkat g-1; AlkPh = 0. 983 nkat g-1). Differences in soil total nitrogen content, organic matter (OM) content, and micronutrients were found. In general, the co-culture stand (with fertilization and irrigation) with C. latifolia showed the best results. |
format | Online |
id | oai:oai.myb.ojs.inecol.mx:article-1912 |
institution | Madera y Bosques |
language | eng spa |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Instituto de Ecología, A.C. |
record_format | ojs |
spelling | oai:oai.myb.ojs.inecol.mx:article-19122022-11-29T22:29:14Z Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations Bioindicadores de suelo asociados a diferentes regímenes de gestión de plantaciones de Cedrela odorata Alarcón Gutiérrez, Enrique Hernández, Christian Gardner, Terrence García Pérez, José Antonio Caballero, Mayra Perroni, Yareni Farnet da Silva, Anne Marie a Gaime Perraud, Isabelle Barois, Isabelle acetylesterase cedar forest Persian lime phosphatase soil metabolism acetilesterasa cedro bosque limón persa fosfatasa metabolismo del suelo A good bioindicator of soil health is one that perceives minor changes due to changes in soil management and leads to changes in the processes of the soil ecosystem. The aim was to evaluate the use of soil bioindicators in the determination of the utility of two different Cedrela odorata forestry management systems. The litter and soil samples were collected from the rhizosphere of a monoculture (with no fertilization nor irrigation), and a co-culture (with fertilization and irrigation) stand with Citrus latifolia. The soil and litter bioindicators measured were the activity of acetylesterase (FDA), acid phosphatase (AcPh), alkaline phosphatase (AlkPh), laccase, and the estimation of the potential net rate of carbon mineralization (PNRCM). The results indicated that soil enzyme activities (FDA and phosphatases) in the litter were sensitive to the different management system treatments. Enzymatic activity, per unit dry weight, was higher in litter of co-culture (FDA = 1.05 nkat g-1 AcPh = 1.33 nkat g-1; AlkPh = 03.0 nkat g-1) than in litter of monoculture (FDA = 0.617nkat g-1; AcPh = 0.40 nkat g-1; AlkPh = 0. 983 nkat g-1). Differences in soil total nitrogen content, organic matter (OM) content, and micronutrients were found. In general, the co-culture stand (with fertilization and irrigation) with C. latifolia showed the best results. Un buen bioindicador de la salud del suelo es aquel que percibe cambios menores, debidos a modificaciones en el manejo del suelo, y conduce a cambios en los procesos del ecosistema suelo. El objetivo fue evaluar el uso de bioindicadores de suelo en la determinación de la utilidad de dos sistemas diferentes de manejo forestal de Cedrela odorata. El mantillo y el suelo se recolectaron de la rizosfera de un monocultivo (sin fertilización ni irrigación) y un cocultivo (con fertilización e irrigación) con Citrus latifolia. Los bioindicadores de suelo y mantillo medidos fueron: las actividades acetilesterasa (FDA), fosfatasa ácida (AcPh), fosfatasa alcalina (AlkPh) y lacasa. También se estimó la tasa neta potencial de mineralización de carbono (PNRCM). Los resultados indican que las actividades enzimáticas del suelo (FDA y fosfatasas) en el mantillo fueron sensibles a los diferentes sistemas de manejo. La actividad enzimática, por unidad de peso seco, fue mayor en los cocultivos (FDA = 1.05 nkat g-1; AcPh = 1.33 nkat g-1; AlkPh = 3 nkat g-1) que en los monocultivos (FDA = 0.617 nkat g-1; AcPh = 0.40 nkat g-1; AlkPh = 0. 983 nkat g-1). Se encontraron diferencias en la cantidad de nitrógeno total, el contenido de materia orgánica (MO) y los micronutrientes. En general, los cultivos (con fertilización e irrigación) con C. latifolia mostraron los mejores resultados. Instituto de Ecología, A.C. 2021-08-10 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares application/pdf text/xml https://myb.ojs.inecol.mx/index.php/myb/article/view/e2711912 10.21829/myb.2021.2711912 Madera y Bosques; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2021): Spring 2021 Madera y Bosques; Vol. 27 Núm. 1 (2021): Primavera 2021 2448-7597 1405-0471 eng spa https://myb.ojs.inecol.mx/index.php/myb/article/view/e2711912/2245 https://myb.ojs.inecol.mx/index.php/myb/article/view/e2711912/2251 10.21829/myb.2019.251365 10.21829/myb.2020.261383 Derechos de autor 2021 Madera y Bosques http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Alarcón Gutiérrez, Enrique Hernández, Christian Gardner, Terrence García Pérez, José Antonio Caballero, Mayra Perroni, Yareni Farnet da Silva, Anne Marie a Gaime Perraud, Isabelle Barois, Isabelle Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations |
title | Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations |
title_full | Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations |
title_fullStr | Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations |
title_full_unstemmed | Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations |
title_short | Soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of Cedrela odorata plantations |
title_sort | soil bioindicators associated to different management regimes of cedrela odorata plantations |
url | https://myb.ojs.inecol.mx/index.php/myb/article/view/e2711912 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alarcongutierrezenrique soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations AT hernandezchristian soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations AT gardnerterrence soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations AT garciaperezjoseantonio soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations AT caballeromayra soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations AT perroniyareni soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations AT farnetdasilvaannemariea soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations AT gaimeperraudisabelle soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations AT baroisisabelle soilbioindicatorsassociatedtodifferentmanagementregimesofcedrelaodorataplantations AT alarcongutierrezenrique bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata AT hernandezchristian bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata AT gardnerterrence bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata AT garciaperezjoseantonio bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata AT caballeromayra bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata AT perroniyareni bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata AT farnetdasilvaannemariea bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata AT gaimeperraudisabelle bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata AT baroisisabelle bioindicadoresdesueloasociadosadiferentesregimenesdegestiondeplantacionesdecedrelaodorata |